Friday, 5 May 2017
Friday.
On Thursday we motored over to a small village a few miles away to look at a 'Banjo' barometer which needed work - so much so that the visit turned out to be somewhere between a complete washout and a dead loss. However we made a detour on the way home (as is our wont - in this case won't go straight home) and went to look at a village church in Little Waldingfield. This is one of those strange places - common enough in Suffolk- where Little waldingfield is now a much larger village than Great Waldingfield. I should perhaps explain that the top picture is of three early buildings which appear to constitute a small, early, industrial estate. The one to the right of centre obviously having started out as a roadside forge.
The next three pictures are of Little Waldingfield Church, and its contents. The Church is a beautifully proportioned, mainly 14th/15th century (?) building. The font is probably of much the same date, and although the figures on it have been ( literally) defaced during the Civil War, the font can quite clearly be seen to have been a lovely piece of work in its day. The oak chest in the fourth picture is a very fine piece of work, also dating from the 14th/15th century, and English.
I know I've said this, or something like it, a good many times before, but I'm still amazed at the number of village churches we have in East Anglia, all of them with a good number of interesting, or indeed fascinating, contents.
Good Night All.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Thanks Mike,
I've added the photos of the font and coffer to my Pinterest boards:-
https://uk.pinterest.com/carlpjhorner/ecclesiastical-artifacts/
https://uk.pinterest.com/carlpjhorner/early-vintage-furniture/
Crowbard- aught to warn you that Little Waldingfield Church is one of those churches that doesn't label the contents, so any dates I've given are all me own opinion. Not sure that this isn't an improvement on some of our churches, where the contents are treated more like that of a provincial museum.
I think if I were forced to wager on such dates I'd back your opinions against any Prince of the Church's pronouncements ~ even if he had access to the original documentation.
Thank you Crowbard.
Post a Comment