Above picture is of our back roof, slates on the lower part, and peg tiles above, looking very tidy (and we hope - now waterproof, too). Time will tell. The main frame of the building is of sixteenth century date (the undercroft is rather earlier) and has therefore not lasted too badly. Must now go and get on with replacing books in their correct order on the bookshelves.
Friday, 20 June 2014
Friday.
Above picture is of our back roof, slates on the lower part, and peg tiles above, looking very tidy (and we hope - now waterproof, too). Time will tell. The main frame of the building is of sixteenth century date (the undercroft is rather earlier) and has therefore not lasted too badly. Must now go and get on with replacing books in their correct order on the bookshelves.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Hi Mike,
Any idea of period on that Roman brickwork in the undercroft? Must be at least a thousand years earlier than the timber-frame you mention.
Hello Crowbard. I've been 'reliably' informed that the wall of the undercroft to which you refer is probably Romano British; and in view of the position of the parallel wall (of which you are aware) it does seem likely. Which means of course that the date of the wall is somewhere between the first and the early 5th century A.D. (the Romans pushed off home around 450 A.D.
And that leaves (in view of the fact that the rest of the undercroft dates from the 1400s) the conclusion that there's a thousand years of building around me as I type.
P.s. Like what you sez, Crowbard.
I suppose that in the original building, the floor of your present underground under-croft was at street level and a millennium or two of accumulations have buried it to its present discreet position?1453
Post a Comment